My first reaction for this story is LOL. As for as my knowledge, an organisation employees people who are hot and s***.
Citigroup thinks different by dismissing a female employee for a crime which nature gave her.
After being dismissed unfairly ex-citigroup employee plaintiff has decided to take up the issue in the court.
It all started when the senior branch manager Craig Fisher and assistant branch manager Peter Claibourne began articulating inappropriate and sexist comments concerning plaintiff’s clothing and appearance, shortly after being employed by citigroup.
“The improper comments made to plaintiff by Fisher and Claibourne included, but were not limited to, advising her that she must refrain from wearing certain items of clothing, in particular, turtleneck tops, pencil skirts, fitted business suits, or other properly tailored clothing.
“In blatantly discriminatory fashion, plaintiff was advised that as a result of the shape of her figure, such clothes were purportedly ‘too distracting’ for her male colleagues and supervisors to bear.”
The filing also read, “In a regressive response more suitable for reality television than a white-shoe corporation in the 21st century, plaintiff was advised that these other comparator females may wear what they like, as their general unattractiveness rendered moot their sartorial choices, unlike plaintiff, whose shapeliness could not be heightened by beautifully tailored clothing.”
“Are you saying that just because I look this way genetically, that this should be a curse for me?” she told the Village Voice, which first reported her case.
In a statement, Citibank said, “We believe this lawsuit is without merit and we will defend against it vigorously.”
Citibank has not commented for reasons of employee privacy but added that the bank has “a strong commitment to diversity and we do not condone, or tolerate, discrimination within our business for any reason.”